2652 odpowiedzi w tym temacie

[boone]

new 05/01 - Guest starring are Malcolm David Kelley as Walt, M.C. Gainey as Mr. Friendly, Tania Raymonde as Alex, April Grace as Ms. Klugh and Michael Bowen as Pickett. Source: ABC

oto właśnie gwiazdy specjalne odcinka 2x22 Three Minutes.. (Waaalt wreszcie... i Zeke i Alex... )

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FROM TV_GUIDE

A tour of the hatch begins innocently enough. It starts, of all places, in the bathroom- where you spot a jumbo-size bottle of Dharama Initiative shampoo in the shower- and moves into the articficially sunny bedroom where Kate nursed a bullet-wounded Sawyer back to health. Next stop: the darkened pantry, which is haphazzardly stacked with huge containers of Dharma olives and yams. You take note of the framed photograph of a generic desert scene hanging on one wall, and linger by the kitchen table where that creepy fella Henry Gale (or, as it turns out, Not Henry Gale, played by Michael Emerson) so chillingly requested some milk for his cereal.

Finally, tentatively, you step into the geodome, a wide-open space shrouded in gray that houses that mystifying old-school computer. Its smaller than its larger-than-life presence on the show would suggest and could use a bit of a dusting. Suddenly you're overcome with the urge to punch in the numbers that every Lost fan worth his Easter Eggs knows by heart- 4, 8, 15, 16, 23, 42- and hit EXECUTE. But, before you can, someone dangles another carrot in front of you.

"Write down all the names of the books in the hatch" suggest Jorge Garcia, who plays Hurley, with a mischievous grin. "That'd be cool. The fans would go nuts."

No thanks dude. That Other sitting outside- the one with the knotty fake beard and that pack-a-day rasp- just might drag you off to the land of Walt. That is if executive producers Damon Lindelof and Carlton Cuse, who have issued a strict no-revealing-the-books-and-albums edict, don't get their hands on you first.

As it turns out, you're not alone in feeling a little on edge. It is late April, and the Lost cast is in the midst of shooting the supersecret final episodes of its second season, The actors have been putting in insanely long hours and will soon be working seven days a week in order to wrap up production in time. Evangeline Lilly, who plays fugutive heroine Kate, sheepishly admits she fell asleep the night before while read the just-delivered finale script. "And not because its boring!" she says. "I'm just so exhausted I can't keep my eyes open.""

**Ok this is longer than I thought, I am gonna skip to the good stuff. If you don't believe me wait to get it on newstands, and I am sure someone else here gets TV Guide in the mail and can confrim.**

**Quotes are taken word for word from the article**

"....After all, the thrillingly addictive ABC hit has never shied away from killing off major characters in the past. And rumor has it there will be funerals for at least two more before the seasons end."

"So what are the producers willing to reveal? For one, they're promising explosive answeres to some (if not, of course all) of the seasons biggest questions. Namely:
-What exactly is the deal with the hatch... ?
-What role, if any, is the Dharma Initiative playing in the lives of the survivors?
-Why on earth do those numbers need to be entered into the computer every 108 minutes? Or do the need to be?
"Our plan is to [reveal] a lot about the hatch and the Dharma Intiative by the time the season is over," Cuse vows. "We're sort of closing the book on the hatch."

"...........In fact, the two-hour May 24 finale features Desmond's flashbacks and explores the history of the hatch through his eyes. S ays Lindelof, "I think the audience [is] wondering where Desond's been and what he's been doing."

"...Absent from the Lost canvas since setting out alone to search for his Other-abducted son, Walt, michael (Harold Perrineau) reappeared at the end of the April 12 episode, alone and seemingly on death's door. By the time you read this, considering the shocking events of the May 3 episode, you'll likely have even more questions about Michael. "When they told me what they had planned, I was like 'Really? Thats freaky,'" says Perrineau...."That scared me more than the time off"
He continues, "Michaels been such a decent guy. Just a dude trying to figure out how to take care iof his son. So to suddenly be this guy was like 'Wow'. I actually called my family and said 'I can't tell you what happens but when people come up to you afterward it may be a little different.' They may call up my mother and be like 'Your son's a bastard!'"

"...The May 17 episode fills in the blanks on where Michael's been and what he's been doing. "He has gone through an ordeal that significantly changed the way he's acting and what motivates him," Lidelof says. "...is there anything a parent won't do to get their child back?"

"..though its clear [Malcom David] Kelley will be back by the end of the seaon."

"....Among the other goodies in store for the May 10 episode includes the revelation of what the "?" in the middle of the hatch map Locke discovered is."

"...What do you wanna bet she (Kate) doesn't take kindly to the news that Saywer slept with Ana Lucia (Michelle Rodriguez) in the May 3 episode? "He doesn't want Kate to know" Holoway says. "But shes gonna find out...."

"And while the future of Cynthia Watros, who plays Hurley's girl, Libby, was called into question when it was recently revealed she has been cast in CBS' fall sitcom pilot My Ex-Life, the actress is an intriquing part of Lost's finale: Libby will figure in a Desmond flashback.
But hold onto your mythology for an even bigger reveal. "We're going to explain why the plane went down," Cuse promises.

Whats more, just listen to what Terry O' Quinn, who plays Locke, coughs up about the finale: "So many people are in life-or-death situations. I don't know if Locke's gonna survive this season. I honestly don't."

Użytkownik boone edytował ten post 02.05.2006 - |09:16|

[Sawyer88]

W programie Howarda Sterna wystąpił ostatnio J.J. Abrams, rozmowa toczyła się głównie wokół MI:III, ale Abrams nawiązał w rozmowie do Zagubionych:

- Tylko 4 osoby na świecie znają zakończenie serialu,
- Scenarzyści serialu znają zakończenie ale w międzyczasie wymyślają poboczne historie
- Nie ma planów usunięcia Michelle Rodriguez z serialu!
- Zakończenie 2 sezonu będzie "Szokujące"
- J.J. nie lubi plotkować o swoich pracownikach
- Wszyscy twórcy serialu są przeciwko powtórkom i przerwom w emisji sezonu. Uważają, że to psuje nastrój w oglądaniu.
- Abrams miał napisać scenariusz do "Wojny Światów", ale był zajęty pracą nad pilotem "Lost".

[baku_tarnow]

"- Tylko 4 osoby na świecie znają zakończenie serialu,"

Uważam, że więcej niż 4 osoby znają zakonczenie serialu.

[Sawyer88]

Ja tylko przytoczyłem jego wypowiedzi, a czy są one prawdziwe czy nie to tego wam nie powiem ...

[marcin]

(...) - Nie ma planów usunięcia Michelle Rodriguez z serialu! (...)

A co miał powiedzieć? Brawa dla J.J.-a, że stara się jeszcze, aby śmierć Any Lucii nas zaskoczyła.

[Sawyer88]

A nie czytaliście o tym, że wiele źródeł z których się biorą spoilery są fałszywe ?! Może właśnie Abrams mówi prawdę, a spoilery kłamia, podobno strona szukająca spoilerów wynajeła ludzi do tego by sami je tworzyli ... poszukajcie na necie tego artykułu.


"W świat poszło mnóstwo nieprawdziwych informacji dotyczących zakończenia 2 sezonu, które są rozsyłane w Internecie przez ludzi zatrudnionych przez producentów serialu."


Cytat z tego artykulu.

Użytkownik Sawyer88 edytował ten post 02.05.2006 - |14:07|

[marcin]

Bardzo bym chciał, aby Ana Lucia dożyła trzeciego sezonu, ale wydaje mi się, że "informacja o fałszywych spoilerach" to kolejna próba ratowania sytuacji. Producenci (po wpadkach ze śmiercią Boone'a i Shannon, gdy o wszystkim było wiadomo na długo przed emisją odcinka) chcą zapobiec powtórce przy okazji śmierci Any Lucii.

[Sawyer88]

Na dzień dzisiejszy nikt z nas nie jest pewnien tego co się stanie, więc to, że Anna Lucia zginie też nie jest pewne. Pomyślcie co by było jeśli by się okazało, że te wszystkie spoilery co do zakończenia są fałszywe, że 23 odcinek wcale nie będzie o Desmonidzie itp ? Nie dramatyzjmy od razu, troche optymizmu.

[sis_detoola]

Otóż to.. nikt nie wie, czy tak naprawdę Ana umrze. A może nikt nie umrze ?
Z tym zamętem to przyznaję i popieram - udało im się go zrobić, bo teraz każdy jest zagubiony i nic z opisanych słów o śmierci któregoś z Lostowiczów nie jest pewne, tylko każdy wprowadza swoje domysły .

A jeśli chodzi o te domysły..hmmm..

W 2x20 [Two For The Road] Henry będzie próbował zabić Anę, z tego, co wiem :>
Jeśli tak, to czemu miałby się nie wydostać szybem wentylacyjnym na zewnątrz i jej nie zabić, bo stanowiła zagrożenie dla Othersów?
Jeśli w TFTR będzie chciał zabić Lucię, to kto wie, czy ona nie umrze, a Henry ucieknie z bunkra do Innych wraz z jakimiś info, takimi jak: Kto może stanowić zagrożenie dla nich :>
Tylko kto znalazłby ciało Any, oto jest pytanie :>
W Odcinku zatytułowanym "Three Minutes" jest pewna fota promocyjna z Lost-Media, tu macie link:
http://lost-media.co...lbum=1056&pos=6
Może to i głupie, ale ta fota przynajmniej mi daje wiele do myślenia, nie wiem, jak wam. Hurley, Kate i Sawyer patrzą gdzieś tam, ale ich wyrazy twarzy niby mówią o niebezpieczeństwie. Może to był odgłos strzału, gdy ta trójka była z dala od wyspy go usłyszała myśląc, co tam się stało?
Co o tym myślicie :>?

[Silver]

Ej ale pomyślcie dlaczego twórcy Losta mieliby nas zmylać fałszywymi spoilerami? Może boją się rozgryziemy zagadkę Losta? To daje dużo do myślenia. Co do informacji że tylko 4 osoby znają zakończenie serialu to jest całkiem fajna (niekoniecznie prawdziwa) - pasuje swoją tajemniczością do serialu
No, a to zdjęcie dane przez sis_detola to dla mnie nic nadzwyczajnego - takie zagadkowe ujęcia były w prawie każdym odcinku.
W każdym razie co tak naprawdę wydarzy się na końcu 2 sezonu to dowiemy się chyba tylko oglądając serial.

[sis_detoola]

No niby tak, ale jeśli chodzi o to zdjęcie - to ludzie mają różne skojarzenia, także każde z nas próbóje coś połączyć z czymś, by powstał wątek .
Na Live Together, Die Alone będziemy czekać z niecierpliwością .
***
Jeśli chodzi o Three Minutes... wystąpi Alex :clap: Co wy na to :> ?
Ale... kto jeszcze...
Czy znane są wam postacie z Losta takie jak Mr. Friendly, Ms. Klugh i Pickett??
Może to ja przeoczyłam te postacie, ale na wszelki wypadek pytam - z góry dzięki za odp

Użytkownik sis_detoola edytował ten post 02.05.2006 - |18:44|

[Jonasz]

Czy znane są wam postacie z Losta takie jak Mr. Friendly, Ms. Klugh i Pickett??

Mr. Friendly, to brodaty (sztucznie) Inny, który porwał Walta, a potem rozbroił Hunting Party. W Maternity Leave, wstąpił bez brody. Sawyer nadał mu przydomki Bluebeard i Zeke.

[sis_detoola]

A no przecież
A reszta?
Kto jest poinformowany o Ms. Klugh i Pickett pisać ^^
A Ms. (Miss) Klugh to chyba raczej ta babka od Dharmy, ale nie wiem
W każdym razie - jeśli chodzi o te postacie i Three Minutes, czyli odcinek o Mike'u, to pewnie będzie odcinek o tym jak śledził Othersów - jeśli tak, to nie mogę się doczekać.

[boone]

A no przecież
A reszta?
Kto jest poinformowany o Ms. Klugh i Pickett pisać ^^
A Ms. (Miss) Klugh to chyba raczej ta babka od Dharmy, ale nie wiem
W każdym razie - jeśli chodzi o te postacie i Three Minutes, czyli odcinek o Mike'u, to pewnie będzie odcinek o tym jak śledził Othersów - jeśli tak, to nie mogę się doczekać.

Ms Klugh tutaj mamy informacje o April Grace, która zagra Ms. Klugh
a tu: Pickett jest Michael Bowen, który zagra Picketta.
Jeśli dobrze się orientuję (a w gruncie rzeczy jestem pewien, że dobrze się orientuję) to są to osoby, które nie pojawiły się jeszcze w Lost, więc będą dla nas nowymi postaciami.
-----------------------------------------
Jeszcze tak jako ciekawostka. Nie wiem co, ale w tym tygodniu stało się coś w biurze Kristin tej od spoilerów (albo coś w tym rodzaju) i nie było cotygodniowego czatu o spoilerach. Mimo wszystko Kristin zamieściła część spoilerów w sekcji "Message Boards" nie podała jednak ani jednego spoilera dotyczącego Lost. Skupiła się głównie na serialach Prison Break, 24, były też spoilery o Grey's Anatomy, Desperate Housewives oraz Smallville.

Użytkownik boone edytował ten post 02.05.2006 - |20:06|

[Radjan007]

znalazłem cuś
nie wiem czy już było, ale podaje

http://www.thetailse...t_pics.php#more

[boone]

Spoilery od Ausiello:
Question: Lost, Lost, Lost. Anything Lost, please! — Carrie
Ausiello: You've come to the right place, Carrie. Back by popular demand, this week's Ask Ausiello is essentially one big Lostapalooza, starring executive producers Damon Lindelof and Carlton Cuse. Not only is the duo answering all of our burning Season 2 questions, but they're also offering up tantalizing clues and spoilers about the final four episodes. Or, I should say, three. Conspicuously missing from the following Q&A is any discussion of tonight's explosive May-sweeps kickoff. For the dirt on that, you'll have to check out my Ausiello Report blog immediately following tonight's telecast. Trust me when I say you don't want to miss it — the episode or the blog posting. And because I don't believe in discriminating against non-Lost fans, if you scroll past the Lindelof and Cuse interview you'll find scoop on 24, Gilmore Girls, Big Love, Rescue Me, CSI, The O.C., Everwood and Prison Break. For everyone else, it's time to get Lost. (That play on words never gets old. Never!)
---------------------------------------------------------------
Ausiello: Aside from why the plane crashed, what other questions will be answered in these last four episodes?
Carlton Cuse: Well, obviously, the resolution of the Michael-Walt story. We're going to answer the question of where Michael has been and resolve the story of him and Walt. That's been hanging over us since the finale of last year.
Damon Lindelof: By the way, we want to preface all of these answers by saying that we feel we are giving definitive answers to some of these mysteries, but often times it blows up in our faces because fans don't feel like we entirely answered that mystery.
---------------------------------------------------------------
Ausiello: Will Malcolm David Kelley's growth spurt be addressed when he returns?
Damon: Did you see him on My Name Is Earl?
---------------------------------------------------------------
Ausiello: Yeah, he looked about the same.
Damon: There's no growth spurt.
---------------------------------------------------------------
Ausiello: But eventually he's going to grow.
Damon: That's something we'll be dealing with in the third season. But in terms of these four episodes, it wasn't an issue. He looks like the same kid who was abducted off the raft [in May 2005], which was a month [ago in Lost] time.
---------------------------------------------------------------
Ausiello: What about the Dharma Initiative? Will we get more answers?
Damon: We will learn more about them.
Carlton: Answers in the sense of more information about it. But we'd have to write a 300-page book to give you all the answers about the Dharma Initiative.
Damon: And, obviously, as you already mentioned in Ask Ausiello, Desmond is coming back [in the May 24 finale]. And obviously he ran away before we had a chance to sit him down and ask him a lot of questions about his experience in the hatch. He'll shed some more light on his experience on the island in the three years prior to when Locke came down into that hatch.
--------------------------------------------------------------
Ausiello: Might he have something to do with why the plane went down?
Damon: I saw that you speculated exactly that in no uncertain terms in Wednesday's Ask Ausiello, and, you know, we're not commenting on it.
--------------------------------------------------------------
Ausiello: Will the episode titled "?" explain what the… I think you know where I'm going with this…
Carlton: It would be a fair inference to say the question-mark episode is about finding out what that question mark on that map means.
Damon: That episode is a great opportunity for us to finally put Locke and Mr. Eko together, sort of a philosophical battle of faith and will that we've been hinting at all season long. [It started] back when Eko gave Locke that film that he brought across in that hollowed-out Bible, [and] this is sort of the next step in their relationship. Just as a side note, the "?" episode was originally going to be the episode that Darren Aronofsky would direct prior to Rachel Weisz's pregnancy. We thought it would be a cool shout-out to him since he made the movie Pi, which was just the symbol for pi.
Carlton: It ended up being directed by a guy named Deran Sarafian. It was hard to find another Darren to direct the episode, but we managed.
-------------------------------------------------------------
Ausiello: Will there be any dramatic developments in the Sawyer/Kate/Jack triangle?
Carlton: I guess it depends what you mean by the word "dramatic." There is more stuff between them, but the focus is not on the romance between those characters. There are bigger fish to fry.
-------------------------------------------------------------
Ausiello: What about the intended romance with Ana Lucia and Jack? Did you change your mind about that?
Carlton: Yes. Sometimes we tell the show what to do and sometimes the show tells us what to do. And as we started to try to work on it, we never really got to a place where it made sense. Those characters were not in a place where we felt it was believable for them to have a romance. We had intentions of doing that, but as we started telling the stories and started writing the scripts, it just didn't feel right to us.
------------------------------------------------------------
Ausiello: I thought you guys said we'd find out this season how Locke became paralyzed.
Damon: I don't remember saying that.
Carlton: If we did…
Damon: We apologize. We're not going to comment on whether or not you're going to get that by the end of this year,
------------------------------------------------------------
Ausiello: Claire and Charlie have been on the back burner of late. Are they going to come back into play?
Carlton: They are definitely going to figure back into things. They've been on a break and there's definitely some advancement in their relationship as part of the finale.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Ausiello: What happened to the army that Jack and Ana Lucia were going to train?
Damon: Well, obviously, Jack and Ana Lucia had a longer-range goal, which is, "Now we know about the existence of these people, they told us not to cross this line, so let's start preliminarily figuring out how we're going to do that." And that entire plan was wildly sidetracked by Sawyer taking control of all the guns, not to mention Henry Gale's capture. When Henry was captured, that became Jack and Ana Lucia's new focus. So, although the perception might be that we dropped the idea of forming an army, what actually happened was that more significant things replaced the need to develop an army. But that concept is indeed coming back for the finale.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Ausiello: For as long as Lost has been on the air, there have been rumors of a Vincent-centric flashback episode. Is that going to happen?
Damon: One of the inherent problems of doing any kind of Vincent-centric flashback is that, you know, Vincent is a dog. [Laughs] And he was owned by Walt in Australia, which would have been a younger version of Malcolm David Kelley than exists now.
Carlton: And he's also very unprofessional as an actor so we don't really want to reward him with a flashback.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Ausiello: What about an episode told from Vincent's POV on the island?
Damon: We're not entirely closed off to that idea. One of the fake endings for Season 1 that we were floating out there as part of our misinformation campaign was that Vincent's flashback was going to end the season and we were going to see what he saw in the cargo hold of the plane. I think that's where that rumor started.
----------------------------------------------------------
Ausiello: The Henry Gale-Wizard of Oz connection — intentional?
Damon: Wildly intentional. You have a guy who says he landed on the island in a balloon, but in fact he's not that guy. What's so interesting about the Wizard of Oz is that thematically it plays with so many of the same things that we play with on the show. When Dorothy wakes up at the end, it's like, you know, did she ever really leave Kansas? Is Oz a real place? All those things that people talk about concerning Lost.
----------------------------------------------------------
Ausiello: Will we ever get a Rousseau flashback?
Damon: You can expect to see more of Rousseau next year, but the story of the wrecked research vessel… it will be coming at some point but we can't guarantee it'll be in Season 3.
----------------------------------------------------------
Ausiello: Will there be a flashback component to every episode next season? Eventually, it would seem, you're going to run out of back stories.
Carlton: The flashbacks are very central to the concept of the series, and we have no intention of abandoning them as a concept.
Damon: And we'll be introducing new characters in Season 3, so you'll be getting fresh flashbacks. You'll probably see fewer flashbacks of our original characters as we begin to move toward certain inevitabilities, but, you know…
Carlton: The flashback where Jack learns how to shave is still enormously compelling to us.
Damon: And the one where he loses his keys.
---------------------------------------------------------
Ausiello: Will we see some of those mysterious background survivors move to the forefront next season?
Carlton: Yeah, we've been so busy telling other stories that we haven't gotten around to talking that much about some of the other survivors. So yes, you will learn more about some of the other survivors next year.
Damon: Also, where the new characters come from in Season 3 is going be part of the fun and anti[beeep]ation over the summer, and hopefully by the end of the finale you'll be getting some sense of who those characters might be.
--------------------------------------------------------
Ausiello: Speaking of which, can you give me any hints about the top-secret cliff-hanger that you're referring to by the code name "The Challah"?
Damon: You're obviously not a Jew.
Ausiello: How do you pronounce it?
Damon: Gchh-hallah
Carlton: I'm not Jewish and I can say it. You're a good Italian boy.
--------------------------------------------------------
Ausiello: And I even practiced right before this interview! OK, can you tell me anything about The Challah?
Carlton: No.
Damon: We are not talking about it.
Carlton: Do you know what The Challah is?
Ausiello: It's some kind of Jewish bread.
Damon: Last year we had "The Bagel" and this year we have "The Challah."
Carlton: We just decided that we're sticking with Jewish bakery products. Next year will probably be "The Matzoh."
-------------------------------------------------------
Ausiello: Damon, it was just announced that you're producing the next Star Trek movie and J.J. Abrams is directing it. Does that mean Carlton is running Lost by himself next season?
Carlton: [Laughs] Rumors about the extent to which Star Trek is going to influence Lost are wildly exaggerated. Damon and I are fully committed to running Lost together next year.
Damon: Lost continues to be my full-time job next year and any involvement I have in Star Trek will obviously be secondary to my day job. I have no intention whatsoever of stepping back. Carlton and I have been running the show since the seventh episode of the first season together. We have essentially produced 42 hours of Lost and, you know, we are going to produce the next 22 hours of Lost in Season 3 in exactly the same way.
--------------------------------------------------------
Ausiello: Is J.J. coming back into the fold?
Damon: He's been talking about getting involved again. Our fingers are crossed hoping that he will, but obviously that will be a byproduct of his own availability. We've both seen Mission: Impossible 3; it's breathtaking and awesome. It's going to make gazonks of money.
--------------------------------------------------------
Skrót po polsku najważniejszych informacji ze spoilerów:
Oprócz katastrofy samolotu, wyjaśniona zostanie również cała sprawa Michael-Walt.
Walt będzie wyglądał tak samo jak w momencie porwania.
Dostaniemy w finale trochę informacji o Dharma Initiative i zobaczymy (jak już wszyscy wiemy) wspomnienia Desmonda.
Odcinek "?" będzie w dużej części o relacjach między Eko i Lockiem.
Nie będzie za dużo uwagi poświęconej na trójkącik Jack-Kate-Sawyer
Twórcy zrezygnowali z ciągnięcia wątku romansu Any Lucii i Jacka
W finale będzie więcej o Claire-Charlie i ich związku.
W finale powrócimy do tworzenia armii przez Jacka i Anę Lucię.
Twórcy nie planują flashbacków Vincenta.
W 3 sezonie będziemy mieli trochę nowych twarzy w głównej obsadzie, kto to będzie, przekonamy się już pewnie w finale i najprawdopodobniejt to będą po prostu inni rozbitkowie (czyli już wiemy dlaczego było ich 48... )

Użytkownik boone edytował ten post 03.05.2006 - |09:07|

[sis_detoola]

To zapowiada się ciekawie
***
A co do tamtej stronki, którą podał Radjan 007, czyli
http://www.thetailse...le_set_pics.php
Hmmm...nawet ciekawe. Z tego, co wynika, to te fotki są ze stacji Dharma - a co ciekawe, stacji na wyspie:>
Czy to jakieś tajemnicze wejście do bunkra? Trzeba luknąć na mapkę z Lockdown :>.
Tu macie linka:
http://img208.images...0/17mapa4ar.jpg
Jak coś przyjdzei wam do głowy - pisać.

:> Hym... próbowałam ten znaczek na drzwiach powiększyć. Nie jestem w stanie bardzo dokładnie odtworzyć tego loga, ale jak je powiększyłam i próbowłam wytłoczyć lub sposteryzować to wychodziło mi coś w rodzaju płomienia:>.
Możliwe, że to stacja "Płomień", a może to ta nieznana, czyli "?":>

Proszę stosuj edycję postów zamiast pisać jeden pod drugim.

Użytkownik Arwen edytował ten post 03.05.2006 - |19:54|

[paula19]

Nie może to być "?" bo pytajnik jest w środku a ten bunkier na brzegu morza. Możliwe że to płomień. Ale żeby sie przekonać który to bunkier trzeba narysować mapke terenu i droge którą szli Ogonowce do obozu "z bunkrem" ^^ Ciekawe co znaczą przerywane linie dwóch innych bunkrów ? Może są pod wodą: bo w końcu pisze na tej mapie że to jest "Trudno dostępne miejsce" Ja stawiam że to Plomień :] bo w sumie reszte trzeba wykluczyć bo zostały odkryte: Pozostaje zagadka "?", płomienia i dwóch "przerywanych"

Użytkownik paula19 edytował ten post 03.05.2006 - |15:01|

[sis_detoola]

I przerywanego bunkra - pomyłki, chociaż nic nie wiadomo na ten temat (bunkier zamazany, mapka z Lost 2x17 "Lockdown" rysunek przerwyanego bunkra u góry) :> .
A jeśli chodzi o bunkier "?", to też myślę, że to nie jest ten z fotki . Moim zdaniem to też jest Płomień :] .

[boone]

05/03 - Lindelof ∧ Cuse: We'll see the resolution of the Michael-Walt story. We're going to answer the question of where Michael has been and resolve the story of him and Walt. The growth of Malcolm David Kelly (Walt) will be addressed in the 3rd season. We'll learn more about Dharma. Desmond will shed some more light on his experience on the island in the three years prior to when Locke came down into that hatch. There is more stuff between Sawyer/Kate/Jack, but the focus is not on the romance between those characters. There are bigger fish to fry. Ana-Lucia and Jack were not in a place where we felt it was believable for them to have a romance. Charlie and Claire have been on a break and there's definitely some advancement in their relationship as part of the finale. the perception might be that we dropped the idea of forming an army, what actually happened was that more significant things replaced the need to develop an army. But that concept is indeed coming back for the finale. You can expect to see more of Rousseau next year, but the story of the wrecked research vessel… it will be coming at some point but we can't guarantee it'll be in Season 3. We'll be introducing new characters in Season 3, so you'll be getting fresh flashbacks. You'll probably see fewer flashbacks of our original characters as we begin to move toward certain inevitabilities. You will learn more about some of the other survivors next year. Also, where the new characters come from in Season 3 is going be part of the fun and anti[beeep]ation over the summer, and hopefully by the end of the finale you'll be getting some sense of who those characters might be. We are going to produce the next 22 hours of Lost in Season 3. Source: Ask Ausiello @ TV Guide

Na spoilerfix macie jeszcze lepsze, piękniejsze skrócenie spoilerów od Ausiello niż moje